Paradoxes in Cancer Patients' Advance Care Planning
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Palliative Medicine
- Vol. 3 (1), 27-35
- https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2000.3.27
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the frequency of advance care planning (ACP) in hospitalized cancer patients and to assess their reactions to a proposed policy in which medical housestaff would offer to discuss ACP at the time of hospital admission. Methods: Structured interviews with 111 consecutively admitted cancer patients on the oncology inpatient service of a tertiary care medical center. Results: We found that 69% (77/111) of patients had discussed their advance care preferences with someone, usually a family member, and 33% (37/111) had completed at least one formal advance directive (e.g., a living will or durable power of attorney for health care); 32% (36/111) had done both; and 30% (33/111) had done neither. However, only 9% (10/111) of patients reported having discussed their advance care preferences with their clinic oncologists and only 23% (23/101) of the remaining patients stated that they wished to do so. By contrast, 58% (64/110) of patients supported a policy in which medical housestaff would offer to discuss these advance care preferences as a part of the admission history. Conclusions: Our data suggest that while oncology inpatients frequently have ACPs that they discuss with family and/or document in formal advance directives, they rarely discuss or wish to discuss these ACPs with clinic oncologists. We also show that most of the reticent patients would nevertheless consider discussing the same ACPs with admitting housestaff on the day of hospital admission.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Extent and determinants of error in doctors' prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study Commentary: Why do doctors overestimate? Commentary: Prognoses should be based on proved indices not intuitionBMJ, 2000
- A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal InvestigatorsJAMA, 1995
- Promoting completion of health care proxies following hospitalization. A randomized controlled trial in a community hospitalArchives of Internal Medicine, 1995
- More talk, less paper: Predicting the accuracy of substituted judgmentsAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 1994
- Relationship of advance directives to physician-patient communicationArchives of Internal Medicine, 1994
- The power of compassion: Truth-telling among American doctors in the care of dying patientsSocial Science & Medicine, 1993
- Agreement between patients and their self-selected surrogates on difficult medical decisionsArchives of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Advance Directives for Medical Care — A Case for Greater UseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatmentArchives of Internal Medicine, 1986