Pupils’ Alternative Frameworks in Science
- 1 January 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Science Education
- Vol. 3 (1), 93-101
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528810030109
Abstract
English The work of Jean Piaget and others on the development of children's thinking, has indicated that far from being the ‘tabula rasa’ of repute, pupils bring to their school learning in science ideas, expectations and beliefs concerning natural phenomena which they have developed to make sense of their own past experiences. These alternate frameworks, in some cases strongly held and resistant to change, in others flexible and with many internal inconsistencies, have their influence on the effectiveness of formal school science programmes. Just as scientists in a period of ‘revolution’ in science have to make a paradigm shift, so pupils in moving from the ideas and beliefs they come to school with, to understanding and accepting the explanatory systems being offered, have to make a considerable journey in thought.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Misconceptions in school thermodynamicsPhysics Education, 1977
- Teaching About Floating and Sinking: An Attempt to Link Cognitive Psychology with Classroom PracticeScience Education, 1977
- An assessment of children's concepts of the earth utilizing structured interviewsScience Education, 1976
- Interpretation of natural phenomena by Lebanese school childrenScience Education, 1976
- Principle learning as a function of instruction on excluding irrelevant variablesJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 1969
- A study of unfounded beliefsScience Education, 1966
- SYMPOSIUM: STUDIES OF CHILDREN'S SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS AND INTERESTS*British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1961