An audit of the implications of implementing NICE guidance on the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
Open Access
- 1 July 2003
- Vol. 89 (7), 787-788
- https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.89.7.787
Abstract
A total of 1637 adult cardiac patient contacts with Freeman Hospital in January 2001 were audited against the standard published as NICE guidance.1 The records of all patients admitted to the cardiac care unit (CCU) (144), and all adults undergoing echocardiography (737), Holter monitoring (126), exercise tolerance testing (142), open heart surgery (115), coronary angiography (205), ventricular tachycardia (VT) stimulation study (5) or ICD implantation (5) during one month, and all patients seen in one week’s cardiology outpatient clinics (194) were reviewed for primary and secondary indications for ICD implantation. The number of patients seen in clinic was extrapolated to a 12th of the number of patients seen annually. Because there was no systematic screening of myocardial infarction (MI) survivors for ICD indications, extrapolations were made from published data3, 4 of the consequences of the investigations required for full screening.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electrophysiologic Testing to Identify Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Who Are at Risk for Sudden DeathNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Prevalence, characteristics and prognostic value during long-term follow-up of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic eraJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- Improved Survival with an Implanted Defibrillator in Patients with Coronary Disease at High Risk for Ventricular ArrhythmiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996