Does Paclitaxel Improve the Chemoradiotherapy of Locoregionally Advanced Esophageal Cancer? A Nonrandomized Comparison With Fluorouracil-Based Therapy
- 10 May 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 18 (10), 2032-2039
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.10.2032
Abstract
PURPOSE: A phase II trial of accelerated fractionation radiation with concurrent cisplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy was performed to investigate the role of the paclitaxel, when substituted for fluorouracil (5-FU), in the chemoradiotherapy of esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with an esophageal ultrasound stage of T3 or N1 or M1 (nodal) esophageal cancer were treated with two courses of a cisplatin infusion (20 mg/m2/d for 4 days) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 over 24 hours) concurrent with a split course of accelerated fractionation radiation (1.5 Gy bid to a total dose of 45 Gy). Surgical resection was performed 4 to 6 weeks later followed by a single identical postoperative course of chemoradiotherapy (24 Gy) in patients with significant residual tumor at surgery. Toxicity and results of this treatment were retrospectively compared with our previous 5-FU and cisplatin chemoradiotherapy experience. RESULTS: Between September 1995 and July 1997, 40 patients were entered onto this study. Although dysphagia proved worse in our 5-FU–treated patients, profound leukopenia and a need for unplanned hospitalization were significantly more common in the paclitaxel group. Thirty-seven patients (93%) proved resectable for cure. The 3-year projected overall survival is 30%, locoregional control is 81%, and distant metastatic disease control is 44%. When compared with a similarly staged cohort of 5-FU–treated patients, there was no advantage for any survival function studied. CONCLUSION: This paclitaxel-based treatment regimen for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer produced increased toxicity with no improvement in results when compared with our previous 5-FU experience. Paclitaxel-based treatments must be carefully and prospectively studied before their incorporation into the standard management of esophageal cancer.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Compared with Surgery Alone for Localized Esophageal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgical therapy alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: A prospective randomized trialThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1997
- A Comparison of Multimodal Therapy and Surgery for Esophageal AdenocarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Management of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus with chemoradiation alone or chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy: Results of sequential nonrandomized Phase II studiesInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1995
- Paclitaxel (Taxol)New England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Activity of Taxol in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of the EsophagusJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1994
- Investigation of taxol as a potential radiation sensitizerCancer, 1993
- Pre‐operative radiotherapy prolongs survival in operable esophageal carcinoma: A randomized, multicenter study of pre‐operative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The second scandinavian trial in esophageal cancerWorld Journal of Surgery, 1992
- Combined Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Compared with Radiotherapy Alone in Patients with Cancer of the EsophagusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958