Group Processes and the Social Construction of Growth Management: Florida, Vermont, and New Jersey
- 31 December 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the American Planning Association
- Vol. 58 (4), 440-453
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975828
Abstract
Consensual groups are playing a growing role in planning. This article looks at the group processes that have played key roles in state growth management programs in Florida, Vermont, and New Jersey. The groups have been involved in problem framing, policy development, policy oversight and review, negotiations among competing interests, and developing procedures for accomplishing complex new tasks. The group processes have succeeded in developing shared meaning, coordinating among agencies and levels of government, and often in reaching consensus among players. But they have been only partially successful, at this stage. The next challenge is to redesign planning and decision making institutions to incorporate group processes in a way that makes effective use of what they accomplish.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Growth Controls Work?: A New AssessmentJournal of the American Planning Association, 1992
- Utopia, Dystopia, DiasporaJournal of the American Planning Association, 1991
- Ideal Urban Form and Visions of the Good Life Florida's Growth Management DilemmaJournal of the American Planning Association, 1990
- The Role of Negotiation in Planning, Management, and Policy AnalysisJournal of Planning Education and Research, 1989
- Myths and the definition of policy problemsPolicy Sciences, 1987
- Evaluation and education: the ideal learning communityPolicy Sciences, 1985
- Coping with Uncertainty in PlanningJournal of the American Planning Association, 1985
- IS OPTIMIZING REALLY BEST?Policy Studies Journal, 1980