Definition and Classification of Negative Outcomes in Solid Organ Transplantation Application in Liver Transplantation
- 1 August 1994
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 220 (2), 109-120
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199408000-00002
Abstract
Objective This study defined negative outcomes of solid organ transplantation, proposed a new classification of complications by severity, and applied the classification to evaluate the results of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Summary and Background Data The lack of uniform reporting of negative outcomes has made reports of transplantation procedures difficult to interpret and compare. In fact, only mortality is well reported; morbidity rates and severity of complications have been poorly described. Methods Based on previous definition and classification of complications for general surgery, a new classification for transplantation in four grades is proposed. Results including risk factors of the first 215 OLTs performed at the University of Toronto have been evaluated using the classification. Results Alt but two patients (99%) had at least one complication of any kind, 92% of patients surviving more than 3 months had grade 1 (minor) complications, 74% had grade 2 (life-threatening) complications, and 30% had grade 3 (residual disabity or cancer) complications. Twenty-nine per cent of patients had grade 4 complications (retransplantation or death). The most common grade 1 compications were steroid responsive rejection (69% of patients) and infection that did not require antibiotics or invasive procedures (23%). Grade 2 complications primarily were infection requiring antibiotics or invasive procedures (64%), postoperative bleeding requiring >3 units of packed red cells (35%), primary dysfunction (26%), and biliary disease treated with antibiotics or requiring invasive procedures (18%). The most frequent grade 3 complication was renal failure, which is defined as a permanent rise in serum creatinine levels ≥ twice the pretransplantation values (11%). Grade 4 complications (retransplantation or death) mainly were infection (14%) and primary dysfunction (11%). Comparison between the first and last 50 OLTs of the series indicates a significant decrease in the mean number of grade 1 and 2 complications. This was partially a result of better medical status of patients at the time of transplantation. Using univariate and muftivariate analyses of risk factors, the best predictor of grade 1 complications was donor.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy.1992
- PRESERVATION AND REPERFUSION INJURIES IN LIVER ALLOGRAFTSTransplantation, 1992
- Apache-II-scoring in the liver transplant recipientIntensive Care Medicine, 1992
- TRANSPLANTATION IN THE NINETIES1Transplantation, 1992
- Analysis of morbidity and mortality rates in right hepatectomy with the preoperative APACHE II score.1991
- Analysis of warm ischemia time for prediction of primary nonfunction of the hepatic graft.1991
- Recent developments in liver transplantation: Lessons from a 5-year experienceJournal of Hepatology, 1991
- Orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with hepatitis B virus-related liver diseaseHepatology, 1991
- EXCESSIVE WEIGHT GAIN AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANTATIONTransplantation, 1991
- The Outcomes Movement — Will It Get Us Where We Want to Go?New England Journal of Medicine, 1990