Concrete and abstract terms and relations in testing a rule
- 1 August 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 26 (3), 355-359
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14640747408400424
Abstract
Subjects have more difficulty in correctly testing a conditional rule stated in abstract form than the same rule given in “thematic” form. The “thematic” form of the rule involves both concrete terms and a concrete relation. Four experimental conditions were formed by combining concrete abstract terms and relations. Fifty subjects were tested in each condition. The results indicated that concrete-ness of the terms is the main factor leading to improved performance with “thematic” as against abstract material in the rule testing task.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- REASONING AND A SENSE OF REALITYBritish Journal of Psychology, 1972
- DEGREES OF INSIGHTBritish Journal of Psychology, 1972
- Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problemQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971
- A theoretical analysis of insight into a reasoning taskCognitive Psychology, 1970
- REGRESSION IN REASONING?British Journal of Psychology, 1969
- Reasoning about a RuleQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968
- A general method of analysis of frequency data for multiple classification designs.Psychological Bulletin, 1957