Evidence for a contribution of the motor cortex to the long‐latency stretch reflex of the human thumb.
Open Access
- 1 August 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 440 (1), 243-255
- https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018706
Abstract
1. In normal subjects, transcranial magnetic stimulation of the hand region of the motor cortex evokes motor responses only in contralateral hand muscles at a latency of about 19‐24 ms. In contrast, stimulation of the motor cortex of three mirror movement subjects evoked, nearly simultaneously, motor responses in hand muscles on both sides of the body at latencies similar to those of normal subjects. In these subjects no other neuroanatomical pathways appear to be abnormally directed across the mid‐line. Thus, their mirror movements are probably due to a projection of the corticospinal tract to homologous motoneurone pools on each side of the body. 2. We reasoned that if the motor cortex contributes to the generation of long‐latency stretch reflex responses then in these mirror movement subjects stretching a muscle on one side of the body should produce long‐latency reflex responses in the ipsilateral and the homologous contralateral muscle. 3. To test this idea experiments were done on normal human subjects and on the subjects with mirror movements. The electromyographic (EMG) activity of the flexor pollicis longus muscle (FPL) on each side of the body was recorded. Stretch of the distal phalanx of the thumb of one hand produced a series of distinct reflex EMG responses in the ipsilateral FPL. The earliest response, when present, began at 25 ms (S.D. = 3.5 ms) and was followed by responses at 40 (S.D. = 3.9 ms) and 56 ms (S.D. = 4.3 ms). There was no difference, either in timing or intensity, between the ipsilateral FPL EMG responses of normal subjects and those of the mirror movement subjects. 4. No response of any kind was observed in the contralateral (unstretched) FPL of normal subjects. In contrast, we observed in all three mirror movement subjects EMG responses in the contralateral (unstretched) FPL beginning at 45‐50 ms. The latency of this response is considerably shorter than the fastest voluntary kinaesthetic reaction time, which was on average 130 ms (S.D. = 11 ms). The contralateral long‐latency EMG response observed in the mirror movement subjects was on average 30% (range 5‐60%) of that on the ipsilateral side. No short‐latency response (25 ms) was ever observed in the contralateral FPL of these subjects. 5. These observations are quite consistent with the idea that the long‐latency stretch reflex responses of hand and finger muscles are produced, at least in part, by the motor cortex.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the localization of the stretch reflex of intrinsic hand muscles in a patient with mirror movements.The Journal of Physiology, 1990
- Mirror movements studied in a patient with Klippel‐Feil syndrome.The Journal of Physiology, 1990
- Long‐latency stretch reflexes of two intrinsic muscles of the human hand analysed by cooling the arm.The Journal of Physiology, 1989
- Comparison of human transcallosal responses evoked by magnetic coil and electrical stimulationElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1989
- Electromyographic studies of congenital mirror movementsNeurology, 1986
- Statistical limits for detecting change in the cumulative sum derivative of the peristimulus time histogramJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 1986
- Evidence from the use of vibration that the human long-latency stretch reflex depends upon spindle secondary afferents.The Journal of Physiology, 1984
- Segmentation of human spindle and EMG responses to sudden muscle stretchNeuroscience Letters, 1980
- Servo Action in Human Voluntary MovementNature, 1972
- The Ferrier Lecture, 1968 - Motor apparatus of the baboon’s handProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1969