Analysis of 14 Trials Comparing Sirolimus-Eluting Stents with Bare-Metal Stents
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 8 March 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 356 (10), 1030-1039
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa067484
Abstract
The long-term effects of treatment with sirolimus-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents, have not been established.This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trading Restenosis for Thrombosis? New Questions about Drug-Eluting StentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Acute Coronary Syndrome May Occur With In-Stent Restenosis and Is Associated With Adverse Outcomes (The PRESTO Trial)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (A Meta-Analysis)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Adjusted indirect comparison of intracoronary drug-eluting stents: evidence from a metaanalysis of randomized bare-metal-stent-controlled trialsInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Meta-analysis comparing drug-eluting stents with bare metal stentsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Restenosis detected by routine angiographic follow-up and late mortality after coronary stent placementAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Standard Stents in Patients with Stenosis in a Native Coronary ArteryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- To IPD or not to IPD?Evaluation & the Health Professions, 2002
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986