Use and misuse of an accident and emergency department in the East End of London.
- 1 January 1983
- journal article
- Vol. 76 (1), 37-40
Abstract
A study was made of all 587 new patients attending an accident and emergency department in the East End of London during one week. Two hundred and twenty-six (39%) cases were not accidents or emergencies; of these, 67% were self-referrals who had not previously seen their general practitioner (GP) and 21% were self-referrals who had previously seen their GP. The four main reasons that these self-referred patients had for attending were that they thought their condition needed immediate attention; they were insufficiently organized to see their GP; they were not registered with a GP; or they wanted a second opinion. Twenty-eight (12%) of the cases which were not accidents or emergencies were referred by a GP. Sixty-nine (12%) of all cases were not registered with a GP. The frequency of cases who were not accidents or emergencies was significantly higher in those not registered than in those registered (0.01 greater than P greater than 0.001). Nineteen (3%) patients were living rough or in hostels. Little abuse of the ambulance service was found.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of anaesthesia. Implications of day-case surgery and anaesthesia.BMJ, 1980
- A study of new patients attending the accident and emergency department of the Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, from 25th January, 1970, to 31st January, 1970.1971
- CASUALTIES AND CASUALSThe Lancet, 1960
- A Series of 1,817 Patients Seen in a Casualty DepartmentBMJ, 1957