Use of pigs for xenotransplantation: the speciesism by proxy syndrome
- 23 March 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Xenotransplantation
- Vol. 12 (3), 235-239
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3089.2005.00215.x
Abstract
When questioning whether it is acceptable to use pigs as sources of xenografts, focus easily shifts to demonstrations that it is more acceptable to exploit pigs rather than primates. Both practical and ethical reasons against the use of primates do not stand when applied to the use of pigs. Consequently, use of pigs is held to be justified.In this paper, I examine the weaknesses that shelter within three ethical arguments commonly rehearsed in defense of choosing the pig as source animal: (a) that the use of pigs for human purposes is embedded in a long tradition; (b) that pigs are not an endangered species; and (c) that they do not share the cognitive and emotional capacities with humans to the same extent that primates do.All of the arguments rest on presumptions that are themselves in need of further discussion or clarification.Other approaches are necessary in justifying use of pigs as sources of xenografts.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Position Paper of the Ethics Committee of the International Xenotransplantation AssociationXenotransplantation, 2003
- Issues Surrounding XenotransplantationAORN Journal, 1999
- Do domestic pigs prefer short-term to medium-term confinement?Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 1998
- Awareness in domesticated animals—concepts and definitionsApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 1998
- Attitudes to xenotransplantationThe Lancet, 1997
- The Origin of SpeciesismPhilosophy, 1996
- The seeking of novelty and its relation to playAnimal Behaviour, 1991
- Case Studies: The Heart of the MatterThe Hastings Center Report, 1989
- Animal Rights – Animal Welfare: A Scientist's AssessmentPoultry Science, 1981
- What Is It Like to Be a Bat?The Philosophical Review, 1974