A Note on the Application of Multiple Matrix Sampling to Standard Setting
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Educational Measurement
- Vol. 25 (2), 159-164
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1988.tb00300.x
Abstract
In many of the methods currently proposed for standard setting, all experts are asked to judge all items, and the standard is taken as the mean of their judgments. When resources are limited, gathering the judgments of all experts in a single group can become impractical. Multiple matrix sampling (MMS) provides an alternative. This paper applies MMS to a variation on Angoff's method (1971) of standard setting. A pool of 36 experts and 190 items were divided randomly into 5 groups, and estimates of borderline examinee performance were acquired. Results indicated some variability in the cutting scores produced by the individual groups, but the variance components were reasonably well estimated. The standard error of the cutting score was very small, and the width of the 90% confidence interval around it was only 1.3 items. The reliability of the final cutting score was.98Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Three Variations on a Standard‐Setting MethodJournal of Educational Measurement, 1987
- A COMPARISON OF EXAMINEE SAMPLING AND MULTIPLE MATRIX SAMPLING IN TEST DEVELOPMENTJournal of Educational Measurement, 1986
- A Consumer’s Guide to Setting Performance Standards on Criterion-Referenced TestsReview of Educational Research, 1986
- INCIDENCE SAMPLING: AN INTEGRATED THEORY FOR “MATRIX SAMPLING”Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977
- Absolute Grading Standards for Objective TestsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1954