Validity and repeatability of the EPIC-Norfolk Physical Activity Questionnaire
Open Access
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 31 (1), 168-174
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/31.1.168
Abstract
Background Physical activity is an important lifestyle which is often poorly assessed in epidemiological studies. The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer Study-Norfolk cohort (EPIC-Norfolk), a large population-based cohort study, has developed a comprehensive questionnaire to assess activity in different domains of life aimed at assessing total energy expenditure. We report the repeatability of this instrument and its validity against repeated objective measures of fitness and energy expenditure undertaken throughout the time frame of reference of the questionnaire. Methods The validity of the instrument was measured in 173 individuals randomly selected from a continuing population-based cohort study. Energy expenditure was assessed by four separate episodes of 4-day heart-rate monitoring, a method previously validated against whole body calorimetry and doubly-labelled water. Cardio-respiratory fitness was assessed by four repeated measures of sub-maximum oxygen uptake. At the end of the 12-month period, participants completed the physical activity questionnaire that assesses past-year activity at home, work and in recreation. Repeatability was assessed in a separate group of 399 randomly selected participants in EPIC who completed the physical activity questionnaire twice with a 3-month interval. Results The age- and sex-adjusted correlation between the objective measure of daytime energy expenditure and the sum of recreational and occupational reported physical activity (in MET h per week) was 0.28 (P < 0.001). The reported time spent in vigorous activity was correlated with cardio-respiratory fitness (0.16, P < 0.05) and with the proportion of time when energy expenditure was more than five times basal (0.17, P < 0.05). The repeatability of the sum of recreational and occupational reported activity was high, r = 0.73. Conclusions The indices of physical activity derived from this questionnaire have levels of validity and repeatability comparable to other physical activity instruments that are used in large epidemiological studies and which have undergone such intense development and testing.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantifying the association between habitual energy expenditure and blood pressureInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
- Glucose Intolerance and Physical Inactivity: The Relative Importance of Low Habitual Energy Expenditure and Cardiorespiratory FitnessAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
- Fasting proinsulin concentrations predict the development of type 2 diabetes.Diabetes Care, 1999
- Feasibility of heart-rate monitoring to estimate total level and pattern of energy expenditure in a population-based epidemiological study: the Ely young cohort feasibility study 1994–5British Journal of Nutrition, 1997
- Estimation of reproducibility and relative validity of the questions included in the EPIC Physical Activity QuestionnaireInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1997
- Comprehensive evaluation of the Minnesota leisure time physical activity questionnaireJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- Compendium of Physical Activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activitiesMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1993
- Energy Expenditure and Fuel Selection in Biological Systems: The Theory and Practice of Calculations Based on Indirect Calorimetry and Tracer MethodsPublished by S. Karger AG ,1991
- Energy expenditure from minute-by-minute heart-rate recording: comparison with indirect calorimetryThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1988
- A questionnaire for the assessment of leisure time physical activitiesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1978