Biomechanical Comparison of Fully and Partially Threaded Screws for Fixation of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
- Vol. 28 (1), 49-52
- https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0b013e31815a5fa4
Abstract
Previous data have shown that an equal number of threads on each side of the physis maximizes stability for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) fixation. The purpose of the current study was to determine if a fully threaded cancellous screw provides greater stability compared with a partially threaded screw in a porcine model. Twenty skeletally immature porcine femurs were sectioned, and a 30-degree angular wedge was resected from the femoral neck to simulate SCFE. Femora were randomly assigned to partially threaded (16 mm) or fully threaded screw groups (n = 10/group). Kirschner wires were inserted in a retrograde fashion to stabilize the proximal fragment. Each 7.3-mm-diameter screw was placed using fluoroscopic guidance to obtain 3 threads crossing the physis. Specimens were fixed in custom fixation rigs, and the epiphyseal fragment was loaded at 0.5 mm/s in a posterior-inferior direction to simulate slip progression. Data for displacement (in millimeters) and force (in newtons) were collected for the entire test. Forces at 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm of fragment displacement were compared between groups using a 1-way analysis of variance (p < 0.05). Increasing epiphyseal displacements were associated with incremental increases in loading. There were no significant differences between fully threaded or partially threaded screws for loads at each displacement. Each stepwise increase in displacement was associated with approximately 325 N of force. There was no biomechanical benefit when using a fully threaded screw for stabilization of an in vitro SCFE model. Although there were no differences between screw types in an in vitro model, bone healing around the fully threaded screw may eventually provide greater stability. The use of fully threaded screw remains a reasonable option in the treatment of SCFE, and implant removal may be easier with such a system. Further studies are warranted to verify these 2 points.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Percutaneous Pin Fixation of Chronic Slipped Capital Femoral EpiphysisPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1996
- Biomechanical Analysis of Single- Versus Double-Screw Fixation in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis at Physiological Load LevelsJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 1994
- Single Versus Double Screw Fixation for Treatment of Slipped Capital Femoral EpiphysisJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 1992
- Slipped Capital Femoral EpiphysisPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1987
- Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in Southern Sweden Long-term Result with No Treatment or Symptomatic Primary TreatmentPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1984
- The Problem of Evaluating In Situ Pinning of Slipped Capital Femoral EpiphysisJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 1984
- A 30-Year Experience with Bone Graft Epiphysiodesis in the Treatment of Slipped Capital Femoral EpiphysisJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 1984
- Comparative Study of Pinning In Situ and Open Epiphysiodesis in 105 Patients with Slipped pital Femoral EpiphysesPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1983
- Effects of Compression on Growth Plates in the RabbitActa Orthopaedica, 1983
- A Retrospective Study of 125 Cases of Slipped Capital Femoral EpiphysisPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1982