Holmium Laser Ablation of the Prostate Versus Photoselective Vaporization of Prostate 60 cc or Less: Short-Term Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial
- 1 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 182 (1), 133-138
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.117
Abstract
We report on the first randomized trial to our knowledge comparing holmium laser ablation and photoselective vaporization of the prostate in patients with a small to moderate size prostate. Between March 2005 and April 2007, 109 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate size 60 cc or smaller were randomized to photoselective vaporization of the prostate (52) or holmium laser ablation of the prostate (57). All patients were evaluated by preoperative and postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate and post-void residual urine volume, measurement of prostate specific antigen and transrectal ultrasound prostate volume. Followup evaluations were performed during visits at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Mean +/- SD preoperative prostate volume was 33.1 +/- 14.5 and 37.3 +/- 13.6 cc in the holmium laser ablation group and the photoselective vaporization group, respectively. Holmium laser ablation of the prostate required more operating time than photoselective vaporization (69.8 vs 55.5 minutes, p = 0.008). In the holmium laser ablation group the International Prostate Symptom Score improved from 20 +/- 6.8 to 6.2 +/- 3.9 and peak urinary flow rate increased from 6.7 +/- 3.9 to 17.2 +/- 8 ml per second. In the photoselective vaporization group the International Prostate Symptom Score improved from 18.4 +/- 6.6 to 8.2 +/- 6.2 and peak urinary flow rate increased from 6.4 +/- 3.9 to 18.4 +/- 8.4 ml per second. Urethral stricture rates were 1.7% vs 5.7%, bladder neck contractures were 3.5% vs 7.7% and revaporization rates were 3.5% vs 1.9% in the holmium laser ablation and photoselective vaporization groups, respectively. Holmium laser ablation and photoselective vaporization of the prostate are safe and effective in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia with a small to moderate size prostate. Both procedures are easy to learn but holmium laser ablation of the prostate requires a longer operating time.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rapid Communication: Holmium Laser Ablation of Large Prostate Glands: An Endourologic Alternative to Open ProstatectomyJournal of Endourology, 2007
- Photoselective vaporization of the prostate – towards a new standardProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2007
- Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate: Subgroup Analysis of Men with Refractory Urinary RetentionEuropean Urology, 2006
- Current Role of Lasers in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)European Urology, 2006
- Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP): The Endourologic Alternative to Open ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2006
- Short Term Outcomes of High Power (80 W) Potassium-titanyl-phosphate Laser Vaporization of the ProstateEuropean Urology, 2005
- Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate: Initial Experience with a New 80 W KTP Laser for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaJournal of Endourology, 2003
- Randomized Comparison of Transurethral Electroresection and Holmium:YAG Laser Vaporization for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaJournal of Endourology, 1999
- The Use of the Holmium Laser in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaJournal of Endourology, 1996