Comparing Patient Telephone Callback Rates for Different Hormonal Birth Control Delivery Systems
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
- Vol. 13 (6), 507-512
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mjt.0000212893.28081.b8
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the number of office telephone callbacks in the first 3 months after initiating use of the vaginal ring, the transdermal patch, or an oral contraceptive. If a patient called back, the reason for her call was noted. Patients were prospectively followed from sites in New Jersey and Florida for 3 months after initiation of hormonal contraception (oral, transdermal, vaginal) and the number of callbacks for each method was assessed. Before study recruitment, the patients had either never used or discontinued hormonal contraception for at least 1 month. All patients were given standard counseling, which included reference handouts specific to their chosen form of contraception. The number of callbacks for patients on oral contraceptives was 30/96 (26 patients, 4 of the 26 with 2 callbacks each); for the transdermal patch, 20/40 (17 patients, 3 of the 17 with 2 callbacks each); and for the vaginal ring, 11/72 (11 patients). Pearson chi2 analysis revealed that all 3 groups were significantly different from each other (P = 0.0004). Most patients called back for side effects related to their method of choice, and some patients called back more than once. Rate of callbacks after initiation of hormonal contraception was the least with the vaginal ring. Use of oral contraception, often considered the gold standard, resulted in a callback rate that was midway between the number of callbacks for the vaginal ring and the number of callbacks for the transdermal patch. The lower observed rate of callbacks with the vaginal ring compared with oral and transdermal contraception may provide clinicians the confidence that this method is well tolerated by their patients.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The combined contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing®: an international study of user acceptabilityContraception, 2003
- Codes and DeclarationsNursing Ethics, 2002
- Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of a contraceptive patch in healthy women participantsContraception, 2001
- Oral Contraceptives: Current StatusClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2001
- Efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of a novel contraceptive vaginal ring releasing etonogestrel and ethinyl oestradiolHuman Reproduction, 2001
- Pharmacokinetics of Etonogestrel and Ethinylestradiol Released from a Combined Contraceptive Vaginal RingClinical Pharmacokinetics, 2000
- Causes and consequences of oral contraceptive noncomplianceAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999
- Compliance, Counseling and Satisfaction with Oral Contraceptives: A Prospective EvaluationFamily Planning Perspectives, 1998
- Levonorgestrel and estradiol release from an improved contraceptive vaginal ringContraception, 1981
- Contraception by means of a Silastic vaginal ring impregnated with medroxyprogesterone acetateAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1970