Liberal Hubris? Virtual Peace in Cambodia
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Security Dialogue
- Vol. 38 (1), 27-48
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607075971
Abstract
The article examines the nature of the peace that exists in Cambodia by critiquing the ‘liberal peace’ framework. The authors claim that, despite the best efforts of international donors and the NGO community, liberal peacebuilding in Cambodia has so far failed in many of its key aims. The liberal peacebuilding project in Cambodia has been modified by a combination of local political, economic and social dynamics, international failings, and the broader theoretical failings of the liberal peacebuilding process. There have been some important successes, but serious doubts remain as to whether this project has been or can be successful, not least because of the ontological problem of whether the liberal peace is at all transferable. This raises the question of what type of peace has actually been built. The authors argue that the result of international efforts so far is little more than a virtual liberal peace.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human Development Report 2005Published by United Nations Publications ,2005
- Collaborative human security? the UN and other actors in CambodiaInternational Peacekeeping, 2005
- At War's EndPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2004
- International peacebuilding and the ‘mission civilisatrice’Review of International Studies, 2002
- The Romance of Non-state ActorsPublished by Springer Nature ,2001
- Peace, Power and Resistance in CambodiaPublished by Springer Nature ,2000
- Quick impacts, slow rehabilitation in CambodiaPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1997
- Three visions of politics in CambodiaPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1997
- CambodiaPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996
- An Agenda for PeaceInternational Relations, 1992