Magnitude and consequences of error in coronary angiography interpretation (the ACRE study)
- 1 February 2000
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 85 (3), 309-314
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00738-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography, coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting: the ACRE studyJournal of Public Health, 1999
- Variations in the use of coronary angiography in three cities in the Trent Region.Heart, 1994
- Cardiac interventional procedures in the United Kingdom during 1991. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.Heart, 1993
- Accuracy and reproducibility of visual coronary stenosis estimates using information from multiple observersClinical Cardiology, 1992
- Interobserver variability in grading of coronary arterial narrowings using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association grading criteriaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Coronary angiography: Safety in numbers?The American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- Prognostic value of angiographic indices of coronary artery disease from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1983
- Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms.Circulation, 1977
- Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms.Circulation, 1975
- Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin, 1968