Ultrasound versus excretory urography in evaluating acute flank pain.
- 1 March 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 154 (3), 613-616
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.154.3.3881790
Abstract
To determine the role of ultrasound (US) in patients with acute flank pain and suspected acute urinary tract obstruction, a prospective study was performed on 20 patients comparing US with emergency excretory urography. US was not as sensitive as excretory urography for diagnosing hydronephrosis, for detecting ureteral or renal calcification or for diagnosing forniceal rupture. Although US is an effective screening modality for hydronephrosis in patients with chronic renal obstruction, it is not useful for evaluating patients with acute flank pain in whom acute obstruction may be present. In this group of patients, excretory urography remains the examination of choice.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ultrasonic inaccuracies in diagnosing renal obstructionUrology, 1982
- A Comparison of Ultrasonography and Radiography in the Localization of Renal Calculi: Experimental and Operative ExperienceJournal of Urology, 1981
- Ultrasonic detection of renal calculi: Accuracy tested in an in vitro porcine kidney modelJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 1981
- Can real-time ultrasonography replace static B-scanning in the diagnosis of renal obstruction?Radiology, 1981
- Ultrasonic Detection of Nonopaque Renal CalculiRadiology, 1978