Laparoscopic Renal Cryosurgery: The Northwestern Experience
- 1 October 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 170 (4 Part 1), 1121-1125
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000088020.00147.8d
Abstract
Purpose: Laparoscopic renal cryosurgery provides a minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of small renal lesions of undefined malignant potential. We report on our series of patients treated with laparoscopic renal cryosurgery. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients underwent laparoscopic renal cryoablation of peripheral, exophytic unifocal renal lesions. Patients were managed with a 4-port transperitoneal approach for anteromedial tumors and 3 to 4-port retroperitoneal approach for posterolateral tumors. All lesions were biopsied and sent to pathology for permanent section. A 4.8 mm cryoprobe (CMS cryoprobe, 4.8 mm × 2 cm × 40 cm, Cryomedical Sciences Inc., Ewing, New Jersey) was placed into the tumor using visual and ultrasonographic guidance, and a double freeze-passive thaw cycle was performed. The iceball was extended at least 1 cm beyond the tumor margin under ultrasound guidance. Followup biopsies were performed on all consenting patients with renal cell carcinoma at least 3 months after cryosurgery was performed. Results: Laparoscopic renal cryosurgery was successfully performed on all 15 patients (6 male and 9 female). Of the 15 patients 10 had renal cell carcinoma. Mean age was 68.5 years (range 49 to 86). Mean tumor size was 2.15 cm (range 1.2 to 3.2) and mean estimated blood loss was 67 cc (range 15 to 125). There were 2 perioperative complications. Mean hospital stay was 3.5 days (range 1 to 11). Patients returned to work after 16.5 days (range 7 to 28). Radiographic followup revealed stable cryoablative lesions in all patients. Mean radiographic followup was 453 days (range 147 to 816). Mean preoperative creatinine was 1.25 mg/dl (range 0.8 to 4.3) and mean postoperative creatinine obtained 1 month postoperatively was 1.36 (range 0.8 to 4.8). There was 1 treatment failure, although another patient had a positive biopsy outside the ablated area. The failure occurred in the largest tumor treated (3.2 cm) and was due to incomplete treatment of the periphery of the lesion. The other patient had a successfully treated tumor but a positive followup biopsy due to multifocal papillary renal cell carcinoma and required nephrectomy. Conclusions: Laparoscopic renal cryosurgery appears to be a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of small renal masses. Careful selection of patients with lesions that are less than 3.0 cm and close monitoring of the iceball is necessary to treat these patients successfully.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Retroperitoneal laparoscopic cryoablation of small renal tumors: intermediate resultsUrology, 2003
- Laparoscopic renal cryoablation in 32 patientsUrology, 2000
- MR Imaging of the Kidneys After Laparoscopic CryoablationAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2000
- Renal ablative cryosurgery in selected patients with peripheral renal massesUrology, 2000
- Laparoscopic Renal Cryoablation: Acute and Long-Term Clinical, Radiographic, and Pathologic Effects in an Animal Model and Application in a Clinical TrialJournal of Endourology, 1999
- Laparoscopic renal cryoablation: initial clinical seriesUrology, 1998
- Intraoperative ultrasonographically guided cryoablation of renal masses: initial experience.Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 1998
- Renal cryosurgery: experimental evaluation of treatment parametersUrology, 1998
- Cryotherapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma and AngiomyolipomaJournal of Urology, 1996
- Percutaneous cryosurgery for renal tumoursBritish Journal of Urology, 1995