IN VITRO COMPARISON OF SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY MACHINES
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 164 (4), 1259-1264
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67151-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of polypropylene vials on lithotripter shock wavesJapanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- A Prospective Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Complications of the Modified Dornier HM3 and MFL 5000 Lithotriptors for Solitary Renal CalculiJournal of Urology, 1995
- Comparison of First Generation (Dornier HM3) and Second Generation (Medstone STS) Lithotriptors: Treatment Results With 13,864 Renal and Ureteral CalculiJournal of Urology, 1995
- Efficacy of Second Generation Lithotriptors: A Multicenter Comparative Study of 2,206 Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Treatments with the Siemens Lithostar, Dornier HM4, Wolf Piezolith 2300, Direx Tripter X-1 and Breakstone LithotriptorsJournal of Urology, 1992
- Comparative Studies of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy by Dornier HM3, EDAP LT 01 and Sonolith 2000 DevicesJournal of Urology, 1991
- Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy or Extracorporeal Piezoelectric Lithotripsy? Comparison of Costs and ResultsBritish Journal of Urology, 1991
- Experience with the Dornier HM4 and MPL 9000 Lithotriptors in Urinary Stone TreatmentJournal of Urology, 1990
- Advanced Technology in Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: The Dornier MPL 9000 Versus the Upgraded Dornier HM3Journal of Endourology, 1988
- Extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy using the Wolf-lithotriptor versus low energy lithotripsy with the modified Dornier HM-3: a cooperative studyWorld Journal of Urology, 1987
- Report of the United States Cooperative Study of Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1986