Pharmacodynamic-Guided Modified Continuous Reassessment Method–Based, Dose-Finding Study of Rapamycin in Adult Patients With Solid Tumors
- 1 September 2008
- journal article
- phase i-and-clinical-pharmacology
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 26 (25), 4172-4179
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.16.2347
Abstract
Purpose: Pharmacodynamic studies are frequently incorporated into phase I trials, but it is uncommon that they guide dose selection. We conducted a dose selection study with daily rapamycin (sirolimus) in patients with solid tumors employing a modified continuous reassessment method (mCRM) using real-time pharmacodynamic data as primary dose-estimation parameter. Patients and Methods: We adapted the mCRM logit function from its classic toxicity-based input data to a pharmacodynamic-based input. The pharmacodynamic end point was skin phospho-P70 change after 28 days. Pharmacodynamic effect was defined as at least 80% inhibition from baseline. The first two dose levels (2 and 3 mg) were evaluated before implementing the mCRM, and the data used to estimate the next dose level based on statistical modeling. Toxicity-based boundaries limited the escalation steps. Other correlates analyzed were positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography, pharmacokinetics, phospho-P70 in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells, and tumor biopsies in patients at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Results: Twenty-one patients were enrolled at doses between 2 and 9 mg. Pharmacodynamic effect occurred across dose levels, and toxicity boundaries ultimately drove dose selection. The MTD of daily oral rapamycin was 6 mg. Toxicities in at least 20% were hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, elevated transaminases, anemia, leucopenia, neutropenia, and mucositis. Pharmacokinetics were consistent with prior data, and exposure increased with dose. No objective responses occurred, but five previously progressing patients received at least 12 cycles. PET showed generalized stable or decreased glucose uptake unrelated to antitumor effect. Conclusion: mCRM-based dose escalation using real-time pharmacodynamic assessment was feasible. However, the selected pharmacodynamic end point did not correlate with dose. Toxicity ultimately drove dose selection. Rapamycin is a well-tolerated and active oral anticancer agent.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phospho-S6 ribosomal protein: a potential new predictive sarcoma marker for targeted mTOR therapyLaboratory Investigation, 2008
- Antitumor Activity of Rapamycin in a Phase I Trial for Patients with Recurrent PTEN-Deficient GlioblastomaPLoS Medicine, 2008
- 4E-Binding Protein 1, A Cell Signaling Hallmark in Breast Cancer that Correlates with Pathologic Grade and PrognosisClinical Cancer Research, 2007
- A phase II clinical and pharmacodynamic study of temsirolimus in advanced neuroendocrine carcinomasBritish Journal of Cancer, 2006
- Phosphorylated 4E binding protein 1: A hallmark of cell signaling that correlates with survival in ovarian cancerCancer, 2006
- In Reply:Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Phase II Trial of Temsirolimus (CCI-779) in Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Hypoxia enhances vascular cell proliferation and angiogenesis in vitro via rapamycin (mTOR) ‐dependent signalingThe FASEB Journal, 2002
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendationsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1999