The Paradigm Wars and Their Aftermath A “Historical” Sketch of Research on Teaching Since 1989
- 1 October 1989
- journal article
- Published by American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Educational Researcher
- Vol. 18 (7), 4-10
- https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x018007004
Abstract
Raging during the 1980s, the Paradigm Wars resulted in the demise of objectivity-seeking quantitative research on teaching—a victim of putatively devastating attacks from anti-naturalists, interpretivists, and critical theorists. Subsequently, the interpretivists' ethnographic studies flourished, enhancing the cultural appropriateness of schooling, and critical theorists' analyses fostered the struggles for power for the poor, non-Whites, and women. Two alternative versions of the aftermath are also conceivable. Pragmatism and Popper's piecemeal social engineering offer paths toward a productive rapprochement of the paradigms, one guided by the moral obligations of educational research.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Process-Product Research on Teaching: A Review of CriticismsThe Elementary School Journal, 1989
- Against the Quantitative-Qualitative Incompatibility Thesis or Dogmas Die HardEducational Researcher, 1988
- Teacher Effectiveness And Process‐Product Research: Another LookSouth Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 1987
- Knowledge and Teaching:Foundations of the New ReformHarvard Educational Review, 1987
- Critical Theory as a Foundation for Methods CoursesJournal of Teacher Education, 1986
- ResponseAnthropology & Education Quarterly, 1984
- Can Ethnographic Research Go Beyond the Status Quo?Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 1983
- Social Organizational Factors in Learning to Read: The Balance of Rights HypothesisReading Research Quarterly, 1981