Using Numbers in Qualitative Research
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 15 April 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Qualitative Inquiry
- Vol. 16 (6), 475-482
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364740
Abstract
The use of numerical/quantitative data in qualitative research studies and reports has been controversial. Prominent qualitative researchers such as Howard Becker and Martyn Hammersley have supported the inclusion of what Becker called “quasi-statistics”: simple counts of things to make statements such as “some,” “usually,” and “most” more precise. However, others have resisted such uses, particularly when they are requested by reviewers for journals. This paper presents both the advantages of integrating quantitative information in qualitative data collection, analysis, and reporting, and the potential problems created by such uses and how these can be dealt with. It also addresses the definition of mixed methods research, arguing that the use of numbers by itself doesn't make a study “mixed methods.”Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- On QuantitizingJournal of Mixed Methods Research, 2009
- 1 The Straw Men of the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide and Their Influence on Mixed Methods ResearchPublished by SAGE Publications ,2008
- The elaboration model and necessary causesPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2007
- Causal Explanation, Qualitative Research, and Scientific Inquiry in EducationEducational Researcher, 2004
- This is Your Father’s Paradigm: Government Intrusion and the Case of Qualitative Research in EducationQualitative Inquiry, 2004
- Reemergent Scientism, Postmodernism, and Dialogue Across DifferencesQualitative Inquiry, 2004
- Comment: Culture, Rigor, and Science in Educational ResearchEducational Researcher, 2002
- Probabilities, Sampling, and Ethnographic Method: The Case of Dani Colour NamesMan, 1972
- Quantitative Analysis of Sharing and Variability in a Cognitive ModelEthnology, 1971
- Strong InferenceScience, 1964