Three Ways to Build
- 1 December 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Urban Affairs Quarterly
- Vol. 24 (2), 188-214
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004208168802400202
Abstract
We contrast three societies in terms of the way property development is socially organized by real estate entrepreneurs, political parties, governments, and corporations. Whereas local growth coalitions dominate in the United States, this is less true of Japan and Italy. National government, linked to conglomerate firms, plays a significant role in Japanese development. In Italy, the national political party system (as opposed to government) is prominent in setting the conditions of local development. Although large corporations are a critical force in all three societies, the manner in which they impact locality differs substantially with divergent consequences for urban morphology and citizens' daily lives.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Challenging Chicago's growth machine: A preliminary report on the Washington administrationInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1987
- Electoral trends in Italy: The cycle 1970–85West European Politics, 1986
- Review essay: MITI as number one: Ideology and industrial policyBulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 1985
- Park Place and Main Street: Business and the Urban Power StructureAnnual Review of Sociology, 1984
- Water from Power: Water Supply and Regional Growth in the Santa Clara ValleyEconomic Geography, 1982
- Italy's Permanent CrisisTelos, 1982
- Community Power and Population Increase: An Empirical Test of the Growth Machine ModelAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1981
- Capital and Neighborhood in the United StatesUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1979
- The Post-War Politics of Urban DevelopmentPolitics & Society, 1975
- A Pure Theory of Local ExpendituresJournal of Political Economy, 1956