Learned helplessness, depression, and the illusion of control.

Abstract

Do people previously exposed to uncontrollable aversive events, like naturally depressed people, fail to succumb to an illusion of control in a situation in which events occur noncontingently but are associated with success? 120 depressed and nondepressed undergraduates (as determined by Beck Depression Inventory and Multiple Affect Adjective Check List) were assigned to 1 of 3 groups that make up the typical triad used in studies of learned helplessness: controllable noises, uncontrollable noises, or no noises. Following pretreatment, Ss judged how much control they had in a noncontingency learning problem. For half of the Ss, events were noncontingent and associated with failure; for the remaining Ss, events were noncontingent but associated with success. Contrary to the predictions of learned helplessness theory, nondepressed Ss previously exposed to uncontrollable noises showed a robust illusion of control in the condition in which events were noncontingent but associated with success; nondepressed Ss previously exposed to controllable noises judged control accurately. Depressed Ss also judged control accurately regardless of their previous noise experience. Results are interpreted as consistent with the egotism hypothesis. (56 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)