Methylating Agents and DNA Repair Responses: Methylated Bases and Sources of Strand Breaks
Top Cited Papers
- 20 October 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Chemical Research in Toxicology
- Vol. 19 (12), 1580-1594
- https://doi.org/10.1021/tx060164e
Abstract
The chemical methylating agents methylmethane sulfonate (MMS) and N-methyl-N‘-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) have been used for decades as classical DNA damaging agents. These agents have been utilized to uncover and explore pathways of DNA repair, DNA damage response, and mutagenesis. MMS and MNNG modify DNA by adding methyl groups to a number of nucleophilic sites on the DNA bases, although MNNG produces a greater percentage of O-methyl adducts. There has been substantial progress elucidating direct reversal proteins that remove methyl groups and base excision repair (BER), which removes and replaces methylated bases. Direct reversal proteins and BER, thus, counteract the toxic, mutagenic, and clastogenic effects of methylating agents. Despite recent progress, the complexity of DNA damage responses to methylating agents is still being discovered. In particular, there is growing understanding of pathways such as homologous recombination, lesion bypass, and mismatch repair that react when the response of direct reversal proteins and BER is insufficient. Furthermore, the importance of proper balance within the steps in BER has been uncovered with the knowledge that DNA structural intermediates during BER are deleterious. A number of issues complicate the elucidation of the downstream responses when direct reversal is insufficient or BER is imbalanced. These include inter-species differences, cell-type-specific differences within mammals and between cancer cell lines, and the type of methyl damage or BER intermediate encountered. MMS also carries a misleading reputation of being a radiomimetic, that is, capable of directly producing strand breaks. This review focuses on the DNA methyl damage caused by MMS and MNNG for each site of potential methylation to summarize what is known about the repair of such damage and the downstream responses and consequences if the damage is not repaired.Keywords
This publication has 120 references indexed in Scilit:
- Repair deficient mice reveal mABH2 as the primary oxidative demethylase for repairing 1meA and 3meC lesions in DNAThe EMBO Journal, 2006
- Multiple Mechanisms Control Chromosome Integrity after Replication Fork Uncoupling and Restart at Irreparable UV LesionsMolecular Cell, 2006
- Hijacking of the Human Alkyl-N-purine-DNA Glycosylase by 3,N4-Ethenocytosine, a Lipid Peroxidation-induced DNA AdductPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Binding of Specific DNA Base-pair Mismatches by N-Methylpurine-DNA Glycosylase and Its Implication in Initial Damage RecognitionJournal of Molecular Biology, 2002
- Mismatch repair provokes chromosome aberrations in hamster cells treated with methylating agents or 6-thioguanine, but not with ethylating agentsMutation Research, 1997
- 3-Methyladenine and 7-methylguanine exhibit no preferential removal from the transcribed strand of the dihydrofolate reductase gene in Chinese hamster ovary B11 cellsBiochemistry, 1995
- DNA replication arrest and tolerance to DNA methylation damageCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1994
- Methylation-induced blocks to in vitro DNA replicationMutation Research, 1985
- Induction of a DNA glycosylase for N-methylated purines is part of the adaptive response to alkylating agentsNature, 1982
- Influence of hydrogen bonding in DNA and polynucleotides on reaction of nitrogens and oxygens toward ethylnitrosoureaBiochemistry, 1979