Bounding the bias of unmeasured factors with confounding and effect‐modifying potentials
- 13 January 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 30 (9), 1007-1017
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4151
Abstract
Confounding is a major concern in observational studies. To adjust for confounding bias, the potential confounder(s) for a study must first be identified and measured. But this is not always possible. The unmeasured factors may also exhibit effect modification, and this further complicates the situation. In this paper, the author derives bounding formulas for the bias of unmeasured factors with confounding and effect-modifying potentials. Based on these formulas, the author derives two conditions (for the unmeasured factors) to explain away an observed positive finding: the low-threshold (for the minimum of two parameters related to the unmeasured factors) and the high-threshold (for the maximum) conditions. All these should help researchers make more prudent interpretations of their (potentially biased) results. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Sign of the Unmeasured Confounding Bias under Various Standard PopulationsBiometrical Journal, 2009
- Bias Formulas for External Adjustment and Sensitivity Analysis of Unmeasured ConfoundersAnnals of Epidemiology, 2008
- Population Stratification Bias in the Case-Only Study for Gene-Environment InteractionsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- The Sign of the Bias of Unmeasured ConfoundingBiometrics, 2008
- Simple Formulas for Gauging the Potential Impacts of Population Stratification BiasAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2007
- Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parametersStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- On the Logical Justification of Conditional Tests for Two-By-Two Contingency TablesThe American Statistician, 1991
- On the Logical Justification of Conditional Tests for Two-By-Two Contingency TablesThe American Statistician, 1991
- Indirect Assessment of Confounding: Graphic Description and Limits on Effect of Adjusting for CovariatesEpidemiology, 1990
- Interpretation and estimation of summary ratios under heterogeneityStatistics in Medicine, 1982