Effect of preoperative pupil measurements on glare, halos, and visual function after photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy
- 1 June 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 27 (6), 907-916
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00871-9
Abstract
Purpose: To prospectively assess the effect of preoperative variables such as pupil size on glare, halos, and visual function after photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK). Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA. Methods: Ninety-three eyes had PARK for primary compound myopic astigmatism. Preoperative pupil diameters were measured under scotopic and photopic illuminance conditions. Postoperatively, patients were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months. A regression model was performed to evaluate the predictive value of assessing preoperative variables such as pupil diameter on the development of glare and halos, contrast sensitivity, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) under scotopic, photopic, and glare conditions. Results: The greater magnitude loss of BSCVA under scotopic conditions in the early postoperative period as well as the slower recovery to preoperative levels in eyes with larger scotopic pupil diameters were not statistically significant (P gt; .05). An increase in symptoms of glare was related more to the attempted level of spherical equivalent (SE) correction than to the pupil size during the first 12 postoperative months (P < .01). The photoablation dimensions as determined by the attempted level of astigmatic correction may result in decreases in the glare BSCVA up to 12 months after PARK (P = .03). At the 2 year follow-up, pupil diameter under both scotopic and photopic illuminance conditions was not predictive of any of the measured outcomes variables. Conclusions: An assessment of preoperative pupil size and the attempted level of both SE and astigmatic correction may be useful in identifying patients at risk of developing symptoms or declines in visual performance after PARK. However, follow-up studies are indicated to identify variables predictive of poor visual outcomes following excimer laser refractive surgery.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusisAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1999
- Role of clearance and treatment zonesin contrast sensitivity: Significance in refractive surgeryJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1999
- Effect of Pupillary Dilation on Corneal Optical Aberrations After Photorefractive KeratectomyArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1998
- LettersJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1998
- Contrast Sensitivity and Glare Disability After Radial Keratotomy and Photorefractive KeratectomyArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1998
- Glare sensitivity and visual acuity after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopiaBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 1997
- Visual Performance After Photorefractive KeratectomyArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1996
- Corneal optical irregularity after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomyJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1996
- Refractive and visual results and patient satisfaction after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1995
- Effective spherical aberration of the cornea as a quantitative descriptor in corneal topographyJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1993