A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study offixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 14 (1), 29-35
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdg019
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the efficacy of a single fixed 6 mg dose of pegfilgrastim (a pegylated version of filgrastim) per cycle of chemotherapy, compared with daily administration of filgrastim, in the provision of neutrophil support. Patients and methods: Patients (n = 157) were randomized to receive either a single 6 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of pegfilgrastim or daily 5 mg/kg s.c. injections of filgrastim, after doxorubicin and docetaxel chemotherapy (60 mg/m2 and 75 mg/m2, respectively). Duration of grade 4 neutropenia, depth of neutrophil nadir, incidence of febrile neutropenia, time to neutrophil recovery and safety information were recorded. Results: A single 6 mg injection of pegfilgrastim was as effective as daily injections of filgrastim for all efficacy measures for all cycles. The mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia in cycle 1 was 1.8 and 1.6 days for the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups, respectively. Results for all efficacy end points in cycles 2–4 were consistent with the results from cycle 1. A trend towards a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia was noted across all cycles with pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim (13% versus 20%, respectively). A single fixed dose of pegfilgrastim was as safe and well tolerated as standard daily filgrastim. Conclusions: A single fixed dose of pegfilgrastim administered once per cycle of chemotherapy was comparable to multiple daily injections of filgrastim in safely providing neutrophil support during myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Pegfilgrastim may have utility in other clinical settings of neutropenia.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim inchemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenterdose-finding study in women with breast cancerAnnals of Oncology, 2002
- Blinded, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Single Administration Pegfilgrastim Once per Cycle Versus Daily Filgrastim as an Adjunct to Chemotherapy in Patients With High-Risk Stage II or Stage III/IV Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Randomized, Dose-Escalation Study of SD/01 Compared With Daily Filgrastim in Patients Receiving ChemotherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- A new form of Filgrastim with sustained duration in vivo and enhanced ability to mobilize PBPC in both mice and humansExperimental Hematology, 1999
- Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF): the first 10 yearsBlood, 1996
- Recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor reduces the infectious complications of cytotoxic chemotherapyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1993
- Reduction by Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor of Fever and Neutropenia Induced by Chemotherapy in Patients with Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Effect of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor on Neutropenia and Associated Morbidity Due to Chemotherapy for Transitional-Cell Carcinoma of the UrotheliumNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- EFFECT OF GRANULOCYTE COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR ON NEUTROPENIA INDUCED BY CYTOTOXIC CHEMOTHERAPYThe Lancet, 1988
- Quantitative Relationships Between Circulating Leukocytes and Infection in Patients with Acute LeukemiaAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1966