Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors
- 1 August 1994
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer
- Vol. 10 (4), 231-243
- https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.2870100403
Abstract
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a powerful new method for molecular cytogenetic analysis of cancer. In a single hybridization, CGH provides an overview of DNA sequence copy number changes (losses, deletions, gains, amplifications) in a tumor specimen and maps these changes on normal chromosomes. CGH is based on the in situ hybridization of differentially labeled total genomic tumor DNA and normal reference DNA to normal human metaphase chromosomes. After hybridization and fluorescent staining of the bound DNAs, copy number variations among the different sequences in the tumor DNA are detected by measuring the tumor/normal fluorescence intensity ratio for each locus in the target metaphase chromosomes. CGH is in particular useful for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in common solid tumors where high-quality metaphase preparations are often difficult to make, and where complex karyotypes with numerous markers, double minutes, and homogeneously stained chromosomal regions are common. CGH only detects changes that are present in a substantial proportion of tumor cells (i.e., clonal aberrations). It does not reveal translocations, inversions, and other aberrations that do not change copy number. At present, CGH is a research tool that complements previous methods for genetic analysis. CGH will advance our understanding of the genetic progression of cancer and highlight important genomic regions for further study. Direct clinical applications of CGH are possible, but will require further development and validation of the technique. We describe here our recent optimized procedures for CGH, including DNA labeling, hybridization, fluorescence microscopy, digital image analysis, data interpretation, and quality control, emphasizing those steps that are most critical. We will also assess sensitivity and resolution limits of CGH as well as discuss possible future technical improvements. Genes Chromosom Cancer 10:231–243 (1994).Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1994
- Molecular cytogenetic analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded solid tumors by comparative genomic hybridization after universal DNA-amplificationHuman Molecular Genetics, 1993
- Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridizationHuman Genetics, 1993
- Detection of amplified DNA sequences by reverse chromosome painting using genomic tumor DNA as probeHuman Genetics, 1993
- Comparative Genomic Hybridization for Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Solid TumorsScience, 1992
- Proto‐oncogene amplification and homogeneously staining regions in human breast carcinomasGenes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 1990
- Cytogenetics and DNA amplification in colorectal cancersGenes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 1990
- Amplification of cellular oncogenes: A predictor of clinical outcome in human cancerGenes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 1990
- Allelotype of Colorectal CarcinomasScience, 1989
- Fluorescence in situ hybridization with human chromosome-specific libraries: detection of trisomy 21 and translocations of chromosome 4.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1988