A Model for Curriculum Evaluation
- 1 February 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 205 (2), 208-212
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198702000-00018
Abstract
The program summary of the American Board of Surgery In-Service Training Exam (ABSITE) can be used to quantitate cognitive learning during a surgical residency and to identify areas of curricular weakness in a residency program. Knowledge on each question is categorized as high (known) or low (unknown) depending on the percentage of residents who answered correctly. Knowledge of Level 1 (entry) residents is then compared with Level 5 (exit) residents. Each ABSITE question can thus be categorized on entry versus exit as known-known, unknown-unknown, unknown-known, and known-unknown. Only about half of unknown knowledge on entry appears to become known on exit. Very little knowledge known on entry becomes unknown on exit. Weaknesses in specific subject areas can be readily identified by ranking questions according to the number of exiting residents who answer incorrectly. Use of this technique to quantitate cognitive learning in a residency program may allow objective assessment of changes in curriculum.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neuropsychologic predictors of operative skill among general surgery residents.1984
- Influence of programmed textbook review on American Board of Surgery In-service Examination scores.1984
- SIGNIFICANCE OF THE IN-TRAINING EXAMINATION IN A SURGICAL RESIDENCY PROGRAM1984
- Observations on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, board results, and conference attendanceThe American Journal of Surgery, 1982
- Resident selection: applicant selection criteria compared with performance.1982
- Clinical performance versus in-training examinations as measures of surgical competence.1980