Diagnosis of patients with chronic heart failure in primary care: usefulness of history, examination, and investigations.
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Vol. 50 (450), 50-54
Abstract
Chronic heart failure is a common clinical syndrome that may have different causes. Its incidence and prevalence are predicted to rise substantially over the next 10 years. There are therefore major consequences for resource provision, especially in primary care, where most patients are managed. Chronic heart failure is a serious condition with high morbidity and mortality. There is good evidence to show that treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction improves symptoms and signs, slows progression of heart failure, reduces hospitalisation rates, and improves survival. Despite this evidence, primary care studies show that patients with heart failure are incorrectly diagnosed and inadequately treated. Most patients present in general practice, and because effective treatment relies on a correct diagnosis, this is a key step in the appropriate management of heart failure. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence about the usefulness of signs, symptoms, and investigations in diagnosing heart failure in primary care. To identify relevant studies for this review, four strategies were used: a MEDLINE search from 1993 to January 1998 using the diagnosis search filter; a MEDLINE search from 1993 to January 1998 using the guideline search filter to locate published heart failure guidelines; a search for review articles in the Cochrane Library; and a check of references in the studies identified. The search terms included MeSH terms and the keywords 'heart failure' and 'diagnosis'. All searches were limited to humans and English language articles. Studies were included in this review on the basis of quality and relevance to primary care. The review shows that symptoms and signs are important because they alert clinicians to the possibility of heart failure as a diagnosis. However, they are not sufficiently specific for confirming left ventricular systolic dysfunction. From the evidence available, a patient with suspected heart failure must have objective tests to confirm the diagnosis. These should include an electrocardiogram and, ideally, an echocardiogram. Further research is also needed on the usefulness of signs and symptoms in primary care, as most studies of heart failure have been conducted in secondary care.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Should general practitioners use the electrocardiogram to select patients with suspected heart failure for echocardiography?International Journal of Cardiology, 1997
- Symptomatic and asymptomatic left-ventricular systolic dysfunction in an urban populationThe Lancet, 1997
- Assessing diagnosis in heart failure: which features are any use?QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Evidence‐based diagnosisJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1997
- Does this patient have an abnormal systolic murmur?JAMA, 1997
- Clinical and Economic Factors in the Treatment of Congestive Heart FailurePharmacoEconomics, 1995
- Evidence of inadequate investigation and treatment of patients with heart failure.Heart, 1994
- Epidemiologic aspects of heart failureAmerican Heart Journal, 1990
- An analysis of physicians' reasons for prescribing long-term digitalis therapy in outpatientsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1985
- Usefulness of the chest x-ray for predicting abnormal left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarctionAmerican Heart Journal, 1984