Evaluation of the Hexaplex Assay for Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Children
Open Access
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 39 (5), 1696-1701
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.39.5.1696-1701.2001
Abstract
The Hexaplex assay (Prodesse, Inc., Milwaukee, Wis.) is a multiplex reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR assay for the detection of parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, and 3, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) types A and B, and influenza virus types A and B. We evaluated the Hexaplex assay in comparison with conventional viral cell cultures and rapid enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for RSV (Directigen; Becton Dickinson Inc., Cockeysville, Md.) and influenza A virus (Abbott Test Pack; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill.) for the detection of respiratory viruses from pediatric respiratory specimens obtained from children seen at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin from December 1997 through May 1998. A total of 363 respiratory specimens were evaluated. The tissue culture prevalence of parainfluenza virus during this period of time was low (1.1%). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of Hexaplex compared to tissue culture for the detection of parainfluenza virus were 100, 95.8, 19.0, and 100%, respectively. Only one specimen was determined to contain influenza B virus by Hexaplex; it was tissue culture negative. A specimen was considered to contain RSV or influenza A virus when it was either culture positive or culture negative but Hexaplex and EIA positive. Prior to the analysis of discrepant results, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of RSV were 91.2, 100, 100, and 98.0%, respectively, for tissue culture; 84.5, 100, 100, and 96.6% for EIA; and 98.5, 91.5, 72.8, and 99.6% for Hexaplex, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of influenza A virus prior to the analysis of discrepant results were 100, 100, 100, and 100%, respectively, for culture, 78.0, 100, 100, and 89.4% for EIA, respectively, and 95.1, 94.1, 67.2, and 99.3% for Hexaplex, respectively. Culture- and/or EIA-negative, Hexaplex-positive specimens were analyzed by a second RT-PCR assay which used primers specific for a different genomic region than that used in the Hexaplex assay. After analysis of these discrepant results, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of RSV were 74.3, 100, 100, and 93.5%, respectively, for tissue culture; 70.3, 100, 100, and 92.5% for EIA; and 98.6, 97.4, 91.2, and 99.6% for Hexaplex. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of influenza A virus were 83.3, 100, 100, and 97.4%, respectively, for tissue culture; 69.4, 100, 100, and 83.3% for EIA; and 95.8, 98.7, 92.0, and 99.3% for Hexaplex. Hexaplex is a rapid, sensitive, and specific method for the detection of the seven most common respiratory viruses in children.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Parainfluenza Virus Infection Among Adults Hospitalized for Lower Respiratory Tract InfectionClinical Infectious Diseases, 1999
- Viral pneumonia in childrenSeminars in Pediatric Infectious Diseases, 1998
- Incidence of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Requiring HospitalizationArchives of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Respiratory Syncytial Virus Is an Important Cause of Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Infection among Hospitalized AdultsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Evaluation of a direct immunofluorescence assay, dot-blot enzyme immunoassay, and shell vial culture in the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections caused by influenza a virusDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1996
- Epidemiology and Cost of Infection with Human Parainfluenza Virus Types 1 and 2 in Young ChildrenClinical Infectious Diseases, 1994
- Why diagnose influenza infections in hospitalized pediatric patients?The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1993
- A comparison of commercially available monoclonal antibodies for direct and indirect immunofluorescence culture confirmation and direct detection of parainfluenza virusesDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1992
- Comparison of hemagglutination and hemadsorption tests for influenza detectionDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1992
- Rapid diagnosis of influenza A. Comparison with ELISA immunocapture and cultureJournal of Virological Methods, 1992