Perception of screening and risk reduction surgeries in patients tested for a BRCA deleterious mutation
Open Access
- 6 April 2009
- Vol. 115 (8), 1598-1604
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24199
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Women at a high risk for breast cancer are offered choices for screening or prophylactic surgeries. The aim of this study was to evaluate opinions regarding screening and surgical strategies in high‐risk women. METHODS: Women at the authors' institution who received BRCA1 of 2 testing before July 2005 were sent a follow‐up patient survey. The authors compared responses of women who tested positive for a deleterious mutation with those who tested negative. For those who expressed an opinion (agree vs disagree), a 2‐sided Fisher exact test was used to compare responses. RESULTS: A total of 540 surveys were sent, and 312 were returned (58%). Of these, 217 had breast cancer, and 86 women tested positive for a mutation. No BRCA+ women felt mammograms were difficult to get because of discomfort, whereas 5.4% of the BRCA− group did (P = .039). Seventy percent of BRCA+ women agreed that prophylactic mastectomy (PM) is the most effective means for reducing risk, compared with 40% of BRCA− women (P < .001). PM was felt to be the only way to reduce worry in 64.7% of BRCA+ and in 34.4% of BRCA− women (P < .001). PM was felt to be too drastic for 36.1% of BRCA+ and 40.5% of BRCA− women (P = .562). Difficulty in deciding between screening and PM occurred in 23.9% of BRCA+ and 12.5% of BRCA− women (P = .046). After excluding women with bilateral breast cancers, 81.0% of women who agreed that PM was best to reduce risk underwent a PM versus 19.1% of those who disagreed (P < .001). Of women who felt PM was the only way to reduce worry, 84.2% underwent PM. Only 15.8% of women who did not believe that it was the only way to decrease worry underwent PM (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: BRCA mutation carriers were more likely to believe PM to be the best way to reduce both risk and worry of breast cancer. High‐risk women who agreed that PM was more likely to reduce risk and worry of breast cancer were more likely to proceed with this intervention. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers With Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasound, Mammography, and Clinical Breast ExaminationJAMA, 2004
- Contralateral Breast Cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation CarriersJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Reduces Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: The PROSE Study GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Average Risks of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations Detected in Case Series Unselected for Family History: A Combined Analysis of 22 StudiesAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
- Tamoxifen and Breast Cancer Incidence Among Women With Inherited Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2JAMA, 2001
- Efficacy of Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutation CarriersJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2001
- Localization of a Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene, BRCA2 , to Chromosome 13q12-13Science, 1994
- Genetic linkage analysis in familial breast and ovarian cancer: results from 214 families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.1993
- Linkage of Early-Onset Familial Breast Cancer to Chromosome 17q21Science, 1990
- Inheritance of human breast cancer: evidence for autosomal dominant transmission in high-risk families.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1988