A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE‐BLIND TRIAL OF TWO LOW DOSE COMBINED ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES
- 1 April 1979
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 86 (4), 325-329
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb11263.x
Abstract
Fifty-five women using Loestrin-20 (20 μg ethinyl oestradiol and 1 mg norethisterone acetate) as an oral contraceptive have been compared with a like number using Microgynon-30 (30 μg ethinyl oestradiol and 150 μg levonorgestrel) in a randomized, double-blind trial. Despite the small sample size, the main finding in the trial is clear-cut; Loestrin-20 provides poor cycle control and is thus less acceptable as an oral contraceptive than Microgynon-30. Although there is also a suggestion that Loestrin-20 may be less effective than Microgynon-30, the difference in the accidental pregnancy rates is not statistically significant.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new procedure for the statistical evaluation of intrauterine contraceptionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1977
- STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF CONTRACEPTIVE METHODSClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1974
- A report of a collaborative dose-response clinical study using decreasing doses of combination oral contraceptivesContraception, 1972