Acute Response to Bronchodilator
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 148 (9), 1949-1952
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1988.00380090043011
Abstract
• We conducted a four-period cross-over randomized trial in which we found that patients with chronic airflow limitation demonstrated symptomatic improvement with both inhaled albuterol and oral theophylline. The response, however, was not uniform. We therefore tested the ability of acute change in forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) following inhaled beta agonist to predict long-term symptomatic response to albuterol and theophylline. We found that the reproducibility of acute change in FEV1 over three repetitions was poor (intraclass correlation 0.17). Furthermore, the mean improvement in FEV1 following inhaled albuterol across the three repetitions did not relate closely to symptomatic response to either albuterol or theophylline. We conclude that acute response to inhaled beta agonist is not useful for identifying patients with chronic airflow limitation who are likely to benefit from bronchodilator treatment. (Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1949-1952)Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inhibition of Methacholine-induced Bronchoconstriction in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1988
- High dose salbutamol in chronic bronchitis: Comparison of 400 μg, 1 mg, 1.6 mg, 2 mg and placebo delivered by RotahalerRespiratory Medicine, 1987
- Efficacy of Inhaled Metaproterenol and Orally-administered Theophylline in Patients with Chronic Airflow ObstructionChest, 1986
- Theophylline in stable chronic airflow obstruction. A reappraisalArchives of Internal Medicine, 1984
- BRONCHIAL HYPERREACTIVITY IN CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE BRONCHITISPublished by Elsevier ,1982