Control of decoherence: Analysis and comparison of three different strategies
- 8 February 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 71 (2), 022302
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.71.022302
Abstract
We analyze and compare three different strategies, all aimed at controlling and eventually halting decoherence. The first strategy hinges upon the quantum Zeno effect, the second makes use of frequent unitary interruptions (“bang-bang” pulses and their generalization, quantum dynamical decoupling), and the third uses a strong, continuous coupling. Decoherence is shown to be suppressed only if the frequency of the measurements or pulses is large enough or if the coupling is sufficiently strong. Otherwise, if or is large, but not extremely large, all these control procedures accelerate decoherence. We investigate the problem in a general setting and then consider some practical examples, relevant for quantum computation.
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 122 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spin-based all-optical quantum computation with quantum dots: Understanding and suppressing decoherencePhysical Review A, 2003
- Multipulse control of decoherencePhysical Review A, 2002
- Zeno dynamics yields ordinary constraintsPhysical Review A, 2001
- NMR Based Quantum Information Processing: Achievements and ProspectsFortschritte der Physik, 2000
- Electron-phonon quantum kinetics in the strong-coupling regimePhysical Review B, 1999
- Zeno Effect in Parametric Down-ConversionPhysical Review Letters, 1996
- Inhibition of spontaneous decay by continuous measurements. Proposal for realizable experimentOptics Communications, 1996
- Projection postulate and atomic quantum Zeno effectPhysical Review A, 1996
- Reduced Dynamics Need Not Be Completely PositivePhysical Review Letters, 1994
- Two state systems in media and “Turing's paradox”Physics Letters B, 1982