Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle.
Open Access
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- Published by Rockefeller University Press in The Journal of cell biology
- Vol. 127 (5), 1301-1310
- https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.127.5.1301
Abstract
To test the popular but unproven assumption that the metaphase-anaphase transition in vertebrate somatic cells is subject to a checkpoint that monitors chromosome (i.e., kinetochore) attachment to the spindle, we filmed mitosis in 126 PtK1 cells. We found that the time from nuclear envelope breakdown to anaphase onset is linearly related (r2 = 0.85) to the duration the cell has unattached kinetochores, and that even a single unattached kinetochore delays anaphase onset. We also found that anaphase is initiated at a relatively constant 23-min average interval after the last kinetochore attaches, regardless of how long the cell possessed unattached kinetochores. From these results we conclude that vertebrate somatic cells possess a metaphase-anaphase checkpoint control that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. We also found that some cells treated with 0.3-0.75 nM Taxol, after the last kinetochore attached to the spindle, entered anaphase and completed normal poleward chromosome motion (anaphase A) up to 3 h after the treatment--well beyond the 9-48-min range exhibited by untreated cells. The fact that spindle bipolarity and the metaphase alignment of kinetochores are maintained in these cells, and that the chromosomes move poleward during anaphase, suggests that the checkpoint monitors more than just the attachment of microtubules at sister kinetochores or the metaphase alignment of chromosomes. Our data are most consistent with the hypothesis that the checkpoint monitors an increase in tension between kinetochores and their associated microtubules as biorientation occurs.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Feedback control of the metaphase-anaphase transition in sea urchin zygotes: role of maloriented chromosomes.The Journal of cell biology, 1994
- Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomesThe Journal of cell biology, 1993
- Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeastCell, 1991
- S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule functionCell, 1991
- Formation of the astral mitotic spindle: Ultrastructural basis for the centrosome-kinetochore interactionElectron Microscopy Reviews, 1990
- Injection of anticentromere antibodies in interphase disrupts events required for chromosome movement at mitosis.The Journal of cell biology, 1990
- The Forces that Move Chromosomes in MitosisAnnual Review of Biophysics, 1988
- Primary cilia cycle in PtK1 cells: Effects of colcemid and taxol on cilia formation and resorptionCell Motility, 1987
- Control mechanisms of the cell cycle: role of the spatial arrangement of spindle components in the timing of mitotic eventsThe Journal of cell biology, 1983
- Role of spindle microtubules in the control of cell cycle timing.The Journal of cell biology, 1979