The Risk of Cesarean Delivery with Neuraxial Analgesia Given Early versus Late in Labor
Top Cited Papers
- 17 February 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 352 (7), 655-665
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa042573
Abstract
Epidural analgesia initiated early in labor (when the cervix is less than 4.0 cm dilated) has been associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. It is unclear, however, whether this increase in risk is due to the analgesia or is attributable to other factors. We conducted a randomized trial of 750 nulliparous women at term who were in spontaneous labor or had spontaneous rupture of the membranes and who had a cervical dilatation of less than 4.0 cm. Women were randomly assigned to receive intrathecal fentanyl or systemic hydromorphone at the first request for analgesia. Epidural analgesia was initiated in the intrathecal group at the second request for analgesia and in the systemic group at a cervical dilatation of 4.0 cm or greater or at the third request for analgesia. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery. The rate of cesarean delivery was not significantly different between the groups (17.8 percent after intrathecal analgesia vs. 20.7 percent after systemic analgesia; 95 percent confidence interval for the difference, –9.0 to 3.0 percentage points; P=0.31). The median time from the initiation of analgesia to complete dilatation was significantly shorter after intrathecal analgesia than after systemic analgesia (295 minutes vs. 385 minutes, P<0.001), as was the time to vaginal delivery (398 minutes vs. 479 minutes, P<0.001). Pain scores after the first intervention were significantly lower after intrathecal analgesia than after systemic analgesia (2 vs. 6 on a 0-to-10 scale, P<0.001). The incidence of one-minute Apgar scores below 7 was significantly higher after systemic analgesia (24.0 percent vs. 16.7 percent, P=0.01). Neuraxial analgesia in early labor did not increase the rate of cesarean delivery, and it provided better analgesia and resulted in a shorter duration of labor than systemic analgesia.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- ACOG Practice Bulletin. Number 36, July 2002. Obstetric analgesial and anesthesiaObstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Two Examples of How to Evaluate the Impact of New Approaches to TeachingAnesthesiology, 2002
- Intensity of Labor Pain and Cesarean DeliveryAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2001
- Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous womenPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1999
- The effect of early epidural block administration on the progression and outcome of laborInternational Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 1998
- Epidural Analgesia Compared with Combined Spinal–Epidural Analgesia during Labor in Nulliparous WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Respiratory depression following intraspinal narcotics: expect it!International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 1997
- Does Early Administration of Epidural Analgesia Affect Obstetric Outcome in Nulliparous Women Who Are in Spontaneous Labor?Anesthesiology, 1994
- Does Early Administration of Epidural Analgesia Affect Obstetric Outcome in Nulliparous Women Who Are Receiving Intravenous Oxytocin?Anesthesiology, 1994
- The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: A randomized, controlled, prospective trialAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993