Mitogenic effects of hepatic stimulator substance on cultured nonparenchymal liver epithelial cells
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hepatology
- Vol. 15 (3), 485-491
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840150322
Abstract
We determined whether hepatic stimulator substance shares its mitogenic specificity for hepatocytes with nonparenchymal epithelial cells in the hepatocyte lineage. Cell lines designated HTC (derived from a rat hepatoma known to respond to hepatic stimulator substance) and FNRL, K-16 and K-22 (derived from rat liver nonparenchymal epithelial cells) were used. After exposure to hepatic stimulator substance, [3H]-thymidine incorporation into DNA was significantly increased (p < 0.001) in HTC, FNRL and K-16 cells, but not in K-22 cells. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting demonstrated that the mitogenic response to hepatic stimulator substance was associated with a greater proportion of cells entering the S phase. Epidermal growth factor, alone or in combination with hepatic stimulator substance, had no significant mitogenic effect on FNRL cells, but exposure of these cells to transforming growth factor-β1 inhibited [3H]-thymidine incorporation into DNA and reduced the proportion of cells in the S and G2/M phases. Simultaneous exposure of FNRL cells to hepatic stimulator substance and transforming growth factor-β1 abrogated the inhibitory effect of transforming growth factor-β1. Comparison of butyrate-synchronized HTC cells with hepatic stimulator substance-treated HTC cells showed that S-phase progression in these conditions was different, with no intervening cell cycle arrest after treatment with hepatic stimulator substance. Mitogenic stimulation of FNRL and K-16 cells with the liver-specific growth factor hepatic stimulator substance suggests that these cells are of hepatocyte lineage. These results strengthen the evidence for a possible link between hepatocytes and nonparenchymal liver epithelial cells during liver biogenesis and differentiation. (Hepatology 1992;15:485-491).This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human hepatic regenerative stimulator substance: Partial purification and biological characterization of hepatic stimulator substance from human fetal liver cellsHepatology, 1990
- Partial purification of rat hepatic stimulator substance and characterization of its action on hepatoma cells and normal hepatocytesHepatology, 1989
- A precursor—product relationship exists between oval cells and hepatocytes in rat liverCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1987
- Purification and physical-chemical characterization of hepatic stimulator substance†Hepatology, 1987
- Regulation of hepatic growthPhysiological Reviews, 1986
- Expression of c-Ki-ras, c-Ha-ras, and c-myc in specific cell types during hepatocarcinogenesis.Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1985
- Ultrastructural localisation of alpha-fetoprotin (AFP) in regenerating mouse liver poisoned with CCL4Histochemistry and Cell Biology, 1984
- Cell cycle regulation of mouse H3 histone mRNA metabolism.Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1984
- Reperated establishment of diploid epithelial cell cultures from normal and partially hepatectomized ratsIn Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 1983
- Hepatic stimulator substance: physicochemical characteristics and specificityAmerican Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 1982