Hypnosis, Suggestion Type, and Subjective Experience — The Order-Effects Hypothesis Revisited:A Brief Communication
- 1 April 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
- Vol. 38 (2), 95-100
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149008414504
Abstract
In a replication and extension of Field, Evans, and Orne's (1965) research, no support was found for the hypothesis that suggestion order is related to hypnotic responding. Confirming earlier findings, Ss were no more responsive to suggestions ordered from easy-to-difficult than they were to suggestions ordered from difficult-to-easy. Measures of subjective involvement in suggestions, involuntariness, and archaic involvement with the hypnotist were no more sensitive to order effects than was the measure of objective responding. Nor were order effects more apparent with Ss who received direct versus indirect suggestions. Direct suggestions facilitated suggestion-related involuntariness and response to the hypnotic amnesia item after cancellation, whereas indirect suggestions enhanced fears of negative appraisal by the hypnotist. Finally, female Ss were more involved in suggestions than were the males, particularly in response to more difficult test items.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hypnosis and transference: A measure of archaic involvementInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1989
- Direct versus indirect suggestions, archaic involvement, and hypnotic experience.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1988
- The effectiveness of an authoritative versus permissive style of hypnotic communicationInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1988
- Structure of hypnotic test suggestions and attributions of responding involuntarily.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984
- Order of difficulty of suggestions during hypnosisInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1965