Oral cholelitholysis?Cheno versus urso
- 1 February 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Digestive Diseases and Sciences
- Vol. 25 (2), 129-134
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01308311
Abstract
The present status of the use of cholelitholytic agents in Japan is presented. Open and double-blind studies of chenodeoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid are compared with respect to their efficacy and safety. Although thein vitro solubilization of cholesterol with ursodeoxycholic acid seems to be less than with chenodeoxycholic acid, the higher dose of ursodeoxycholic acid which can be used because of the lack of side effects such as diarrhea and elevation of transaminases and a lower lithogenic index of bile obtainable favors ursodeoxycholic acid as an oral cholelitholytic agent at the moment.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stone dissolution and the national cooperative gallstone studyDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1977
- URSODEOXYCHOLIC ACID TREATMENT OF GALLSTONESThe Lancet, 1977
- DISSOLUTION OF CHOLESTEROL GALLSTONES BY URSODEOXYCHOLIC ACIDThe Lancet, 1977
- Efficacy and Specificity of Chenodeoxycholic Acid Therapy for Dissolving GallstonesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1973
- GALLSTONE DISSOLUTION IN MAN USING CHENODEOXYCHOLIC ACIDThe Lancet, 1972
- Dissolution of Cholesterol Gallstones by Chenodeoxycholic AcidNew England Journal of Medicine, 1972
- Some Unique Biologic Characteristics of the Masai of East AfricaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1971
- Changing state of gallstone disease in Japan: Composition of the stones and treatment of the conditionThe American Journal of Surgery, 1970
- The Southwestern American Indian's Burden: Biliary DiseasePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1962
- Solubility of Cholesterol and Gallstones in Metabolic MaterialArchives of Surgery, 1957