2. The Case for Active Voluntary Euthanasia
- 1 September 1986
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Law, Medicine and Health Care
- Vol. 14 (3-4), 145-148
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.1986.tb00969.x
Abstract
I want to begin by making the fundamental point that the question is not whether decisions to end human lives ought to be made but, rather, who makes these decisions, and on the basis of what principles or values. For the fact is that such decisions are already being made, and inevitably must be made, in modern hospitals.For almost any life-threatening condition, modern medical technology can now delay the moment of death. Death will often not occur until and unless the decision has been made to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. In other words, when and how a patient dies is increasingly the outcome of a deliberate human decision. Such decisions—not to resuscitate a terminally ill patient, not to continue to sustain the life of a permanently comatose patient. or to withhold antibiotics from the deaf and blind octogenarian—are all instances of the intentional termination of life and, if done for the patient's sake, are cases of passive euthanasia.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Modern Myth. That Letting Die is not the Intentional Causation of Death: some reflections on the trial and acquittal of Dr Leonard ArthurJournal of Applied Philosophy, 1984
- Are we a ‘death-denying’ society? A sociological reviewSocial Science & Medicine, 1984
- The Least Worst DeathThe Hastings Center Report, 1983