Long term follow up of women with borderline cervical smear test results: effects of age and viral infection on progression to high grade dyskaryosis.
- 9 May 1992
- Vol. 304 (6836), 1209-1212
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.304.6836.1209
Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To follow up and assess the significance of borderline change in cervical smears. DESIGN--Retrospective study of women undergoing routine cervical cytological screening in 1981. SETTING--Avon Cervical Screening Programme, covering 250,000 women in Bristol and Weston super Mare. SUBJECTS--437 women showing borderline cervical changes in 1981 and 437 age matched controls with normal results in 1981. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Cytological progression to high grade dyskaryosis (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III or invasive carcinoma). RESULTS--During follow up ranging from 13 to 106 months 98 of the 437 women (22.4%) with borderline cytological changes on routine cervical cytology screening had a subsequent smear test showing high grade dyskaryosis compared with three of the 437 women (0.9%) in the control group. The risk of progression was greater in women aged 20 to 39 than in those aged 40 and over. Human papillomavirus infection had initially been diagnosed cytologically in 101 of the 437 (23%) women with borderline results. Significantly fewer of these women developed high grade dyskaryosis (13/98 (13%) v 88/339 (26%), p less than 0.05). CONCLUSIONS--Women with borderline smear test results are at increased risk of developing high grade dyskaryosis, particularly if the borderline changes occur without cytological features of human papillomavirus infection. Progression occurs within three years in 50% of cases, although a linearly increasing risk was sustained over the nine years of follow up and was greatest in women aged 20 to 39. Careful follow up of these women is indicated.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Six years' audit of laboratory workload and rates of referral for colposcopy in a cervical screening programme in three districts.BMJ, 1990
- The accuracy of repeat cytology in women with mildly dyskaryotic smearsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- Does HPV cause cervical cancer?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1988
- Genital virus infection and cervical neoplasiaBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1988
- MANAGEMENT OF MILDLY ABNORMAL CERVICAL SMEARSThe Lancet, 1987
- Terminology in gynaecological cytopathology: report of the Working Party of The British Society for Clinical CytologyJournal of Clinical Pathology, 1986
- PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF RISK OF CERVICAL CANCER AFTER CYTOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONThe Lancet, 1986
- Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colposcopy?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1986
- Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and ‘warty’ atypia: a study of colposcopic, histological and cytological characteristicsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1982
- WOMEN WITH POSITIVE CERVICAL SMEARS BUT WITHOUT SURGICAL INTERVENTIONThe Lancet, 1978