The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives
- 1 March 1968
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 62 (1), 144-168
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1953331
Abstract
Most people who study politics are in general agreement, it seems to me, on at least two propositions. First, we agree that for a political system to be viable, for it to succeed in performing tasks of authoritative resource allocation, problem solving, conflict settlement, and so on, in behalf of a population of any substantial size, it must be institutionalized. That is to say, organizations must be created and sustained that are specialized to political activity. Otherwise, the political system is likely to be unstable, weak, and incapable of servicing the demands or protecting the interests of its constituent groups. Secondly, it is generally agreed that for a political system to be in some sense free and democratic, means must be found for institutionalizing representativeness with all the diversity that this implies, and for legitimizing yet at the same time containing political opposition within the system.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Organizational Size, Complexity, and FormalizationAmerican Sociological Review, 1967
- Jeffersonian Attitudes Toward Executive Leadership and Committee Development in the House of Representatives, 1789-1829The Western Political Quarterly, 1965
- ‘The Most Important and Venerable Function’: A Study of Commons Supply ProcedurePolitical Studies, 1965
- The Congressional PartyAmerican Political Science Review, 1960
- The Supreme Court's New RulesHarvard Law Review, 1954
- The Business of the Supreme Court as Conducted by Chief Justice HughesHarvard Law Review, 1949
- The Life of Henry ClayThe Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 1938
- Autobiography of Seventy YearsThe American Historical Review, 1904
- Thaddeus StevensThe American Historical Review, 1899
- Ancient LawThe Crayon, 1861