North American Solitaire Stent Retriever Acute Stroke registry: post-marketing revascularization and clinical outcome results
- 5 September 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
- Vol. 6 (8), 584-588
- https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010895
Abstract
Background Limited post-marketing data exist on the use of the Solitaire FR device in clinical practice. The North American Solitaire Stent Retriever Acute Stroke (NASA) registry aimed to assess the real world performance of the Solitaire FR device in contrast with the results from the SWIFT (Solitaire with the Intention for Thrombectomy) and TREVO 2 (Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularization of large vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke) trials. Methods The investigator initiated NASA registry recruited North American sites to submit retrospective angiographic and clinical outcome data on consecutive acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with the Solitaire FR between March 2012 and February 2013. The primary outcome was a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia (TIMI) score of ≥2 or a Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score of ≥2a. Secondary outcomes were 90 day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Results 354 patients underwent treatment for AIS using the Solitaire FR device in 24 centers. Mean time from onset to groin puncture was 363.4±239 min, mean fluoroscopy time was 32.9±25.7 min, and mean procedure time was 100.9±57.8 min. Recanalization outcome: TIMI ≥2 rate of 83.3% (315/354) and TICI ≥2a rate of 87.5% (310/354) compared with the operator reported TIMI ≥2 rate of 83% in SWIFT and TICI ≥2a rate of 85% in TREVO 2. Clinical outcome: 42% (132/315) of NASA patients demonstrated a 90 day mRS ≤2 compared with 37% (SWIFT) and 40% (TREVO 2). 90 day mortality was 30.2% (95/315) versus 17.2% (SWIFT) and 29% (TREVO 2). Conclusions The NASA registry demonstrated that the Solitaire FR device performance in clinical practice is comparable with the SWIFT and TREVO 2 trial results.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Solitaire Flow Restoration Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic StrokeNeurosurgery, 2013
- A Trial of Imaging Selection and Endovascular Treatment for Ischemic StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Endovascular Therapy after Intravenous t-PA versus t-PA Alone for StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- SOLITAIRE™ with the Intention for Thrombectomy (SWIFT) Trial: Design of a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study Comparing the SOLITAIRE™ Flow Restoration Device and the MERCI Retriever in Acute Ischaemic StrokeInternational Journal of Stroke, 2012
- Retrievable stents, “stentrievers,” for endovascular acute ischemic stroke therapyNeurology, 2012
- The Penumbra system for mechanical thrombectomy in endovascular acute ischemic stroke therapyNeurology, 2012
- Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trialThe Lancet, 2012
- Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2012
- Solitaire FR thrombectomy system: immediate results in 56 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patientsJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 2011
- The Penumbra Pivotal Stroke TrialStroke, 2009