Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 4 July 2012
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Implementation Science
- Vol. 7 (1), 62
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-62
Abstract
Clinical practice guidelines are one of the foundations of efforts to improve health care. In 1999, we authored a paper about methods to develop guidelines. Since it was published, the methods of guideline development have progressed both in terms of methods and necessary procedures and the context for guideline development has changed with the emergence of guideline clearing houses and large scale guideline production organisations (such as the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence). It therefore seems timely to, in a series of three articles, update and extend our earlier paper. In this third paper we discuss the issues of: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the two emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and how guideline developers should approach dealing with the issue of patients who will be the subject of guidelines having co-morbid conditions.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementabilityImplementation Science, 2011
- AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health careJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocolImplementation Science, 2010
- Words matter: increasing the implementation of clinical guidelinesQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2005
- Clinical Practice Guidelines and Quality of Care for Older Patients With Multiple Comorbid DiseasesJAMA, 2005
- Assessing the need to update prevention guidelines: a comparison of two methodsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2004
- Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specificBMJ, 2004
- Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE projectQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2003
- When should clinical guidelines be updated?BMJ, 2001
- Clinical guidelines: Developing guidelinesBMJ, 1999