Early postoperative enteral nutrition improves gut oxygenation and reduces costs compared with total parenteral nutrition
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 29 (2), 242-248
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200102000-00003
Abstract
To evaluate the potential clinical, metabolic, and economic advantages of enteral nutrition over total parenteral nutrition. Prospective, randomized clinical trial. Department of surgery in a university hospital. Two hundred and fifty-seven patients with cancer of the stomach (n = 121), pancreas (n = 110), or esophagus (n = 26) were randomized to receive postoperative total parenteral nutrition (TPN group, n = 131) or early enteral nutrition (EEN group, n = 126). The nutritional goal was 25 kcal/kg/day. The two nutritional formulas were isocaloric and isonitrogenous, and they were continued until oral intake was at least 800 kcal/day. Morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and treatment costs were evaluated in all patients. In 40 consecutive patients, selected nutritional, immunologic and inflammatory variables were studied. Moreover, intestinal oxygen tension was evaluated by micropolarographic implantable probes. The nutritional goal was reached in 100/126 (79.3%) patients in the EEN group and in 128/131 (97.7%) patients in the TPN group (p < .001). In the EEN group, hyperglycemia (serum glucose, >200 mg/dL) was observed in 4.7% of the patients vs. 9.1% in the TPN group (p = NS). Alteration of serum electrolyte levels was 3.9% in the EEN group vs. 13.7% in the TPN group (p < .01). No significant difference was found in nutritional, immunologic, and inflammatory variables between the two groups. The overall complication rate was similar (40.4% for TPN vs. 35.7%, for EEN;p = .52). No difference was detected for either infectious or noninfectious complications, length of hospital stay, and mortality. From postoperative day 5, intestinal oxygen tension recovered faster in the EEN group than in the TPN group (43 ± 5 mm Hg vs. 31 ± 4 mm Hg at day 7;p < .001). EEN was four-fold less expensive than TPN ($25 vs. $90.60/day, respectively). EEN represents a rational alternative to TPN in patients who undergo upper gastrointestinal tract surgery for cancer and who clinically require postoperative artificial nutrition.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Enteral nutrition in intensive care patients: a practical approachIntensive Care Medicine, 1998
- Artificial nutrition after major abdominal surgeryCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- Effect of Route of Delivery and Formulation of Postoperative Nutritional Support in Patients Undergoing Major Operations for Malignant NeoplasmsArchives of Surgery, 1997
- Nutrition Support in Clinical Practice: Review of Published Data and Recommendations for Future Research DirectionsJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1997
- Perioperative artificial nutrition in elective adult surgeryClinical Nutrition, 1996
- Randomised trial of safety and efficacy of immediate postoperative enteral feeding in patients undergoing gastrointestinal resectionBMJ, 1996
- Anastomotic Tissue Oxygen Tension during Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal CarcinomaEuropean Surgical Research, 1996
- Route of Nutritional Supply Influences Local, Systemic, and Remote Organ Responses to Intraperitoneal Bacterial ChallengeAnnals of Surgery, 1996
- Role of early enteral feeding and acute starvation on postburn bacterial translocation and host defenseCritical Care Medicine, 1994
- The grading of sepsisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1983