Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
- 13 December 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 274 (22), 1800-1804
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530220066035
Abstract
THE ULTIMATE PURPOSE of applied health research is to improve health care. Summarizing the literature to adduce recommendations for clinical practice is an important part of the process. Recently, the health sciences community has reduced the bias and imprecision of traditional literature summaries and their associated recommendations through the development of rigorous criteria for both literature overviews1-3and practice guidelines.4,5Even when recommendations come from such rigorous approaches, however, it is important to differentiate between those based on weak vs strong evidence. Recommendations based on inadequate evidence often require reversal when sufficient data become available,6while timely implementation of recommendations based on strong evidence can save lives.6In this article, we suggest an approach to classifying strength of recommendations. We direct our discussion primarily at clinicians who make treatment recommendations that they hope their colleagues will follow. However, we believe that any clinician who attends toKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinically useful measures of effect in binary analyses of randomized trialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- Who benefits from medical interventions?BMJ, 1994
- Alternative Perspectives on the Biased Foundations of Medical Technology AssessmentAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1993
- A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarctionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1992
- Large trials with simple protocols: Indications and contraindicationsControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Meta-Analysis in Clinical ResearchAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1987
- H_2-Antagonists and HepatitisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1986
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Sensitivity and specificity of clinical trials. Randomized v historical controlsArchives of Internal Medicine, 1983